Search for: All records

Newly emerging multiprocessor system-on-a-chip (MPSoC) platforms provide hard processing cores with programmable logic (PL) for high-performance computing applications. In this article, we take a deep look into these commercially available heterogeneous platforms and show how to design mixed-criticality applications such that different processing components can be isolated to avoid contention on the shared resources such as last-level cache and main memory. Our approach involves software/hardware co-design to achieve isolation between the different criticality domains. At the hardware level, we use a scratchpad memory (SPM) with dedicated interfaces inside the PL to avoid conflicts in the main memory. At the software level, we employ a hypervisor to support cache-coloring such that conflicts at the shared L2 cache can be avoided. In order to move the tasks in/out of the SPM memory, we rely on a DMA engine and propose a new CPU-DMA co-scheduling policy, called Lazy Load, for which we also derive the response time analysis. The results of a case study on image processing demonstrate that the contention on the shared memory subsystem can be avoided when running with our proposed architecture. Moreover, comprehensive schedulability evaluations show that the newly proposed Lazy Load policy outperforms the existing CPU-DMA scheduling approaches and is effective in mitigating the main memory interference in our proposed architecture. 

We are witnessing a race to meet the ever-growing computation requirements of emerging AI applications to provide perception and control in autonomous vehicles — e.g., self-driving cars and UAVs. To remain competitive, vendors are packing more processing units (CPUs, programmable logic, GPUs, and hardware accelerators) into next-generation multiprocessor systems-on-a-chip (MPSoC). As a result, modern embedded platforms are achieving new heights in peak computational capacity. Unfortunately, however, the collateral and inevitable increase in complexity represents a major obstacle for the development of correct-by-design safety-critical real-time applications. Due to the ever-growing gap between fast-paced hardware evolution and comparatively slower evolution of real-time operating systems (RTOS), there is a need for real-time oriented full-platform management frameworks to complement traditional RTOS designs. In this work, we propose one such framework, namely the X-Stream framework, for the definition, synthesis, and analysis of real-time workloads targeting state-of-the-art accelerator-augmented embedded platforms. Our X-Stream framework is designed around two cardinal principles. First, computation and data movements are orchestrated to achieve predictability by design. For this purpose, iterative computation over large data chunks is divided into subsequent segments. These segments are then streamed leveraging the three-phase execution model (load, execute and unload). Second, the framework is workflow-centric: system designers can specify their workflow and the necessary code for workflow orchestration is automatically generated. In addition to automating the deployment of user-defined hardware-accelerated workloads, X-Stream supports the deployment of some computation segments on traditional CPUs. Finally, X-Stream allows the definition of real-time partitions. Each partition groups applications belonging to the same criticality level and that share the same set of hardware resources, with support for preemptive priority-driven scheduling. Conversely, freedom from interference for applications deployed in different partitions is guaranteed by design. We provide a full-system implementation that includes RTOS integration and showcase the proposed X-Stream framework on a Xilinx Ultrascale+ platform by focusing on a matrix-multiplication and addition kernel use-case. 

Timing correctness is crucial in a multi-criticality real-time system, such as an autonomous driving system. It has been recently shown that these systems can be vulnerable to timing inference attacks, mainly due to their predictable behavioral patterns. Existing solutions like schedule randomization cannot protect against such attacks, often limited by the system’s real-time nature. This article presents “ SchedGuard++ ”: a temporal protection framework for Linux-based real-time systems that protects against posterior schedule-based attacks by preventing untrusted tasks from executing during specific time intervals. SchedGuard++ supports multi-core platforms and is implemented using Linux containers and a customized Linux kernel real-time scheduler. We provide schedulability analysis assuming the Logical Execution Time (LET) paradigm, which enforces I/O predictability. The proposed response time analysis takes into account the interference from trusted and untrusted tasks and the impact of the protection mechanism. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system using a realistic radio-controlled rover platform. Not only is “ SchedGuard++ ” able to protect against the posterior schedule-based attacks, but it also ensures that the real-time tasks/containers meet their temporal requirements. 

The proliferation of multi-core, accelerator-enabled embedded systems has introduced new opportunities to consolidate real-time systems of increasing complexity. But the road to build confidence on the temporal behavior of co-running applications has presented formidable challenges. Most prominently, the main memory subsystem represents a performance bottleneck for both CPUs and accelerators. And industry-viable frameworks for full-system main memory management and performance analysis are past due. In this paper, we propose our Envelope-aWare Predictive model, or E-WarP for short. E-WarP is a methodology and technological framework to (1) analyze the memory demand of applications following a profile-driven approach; (2) make realistic predictions on the temporal behavior of workload deployed on CPUs and accelerators; and (3) perform saturation-aware system consolidation. This work aims at providing the technological foundations as well as the theoretical grassroots for truly workload-aware analysis of real-time systems. This work combines traditional CPU-centric bandwidth regulation techniques with state-of-the-art hardware support for memory traffic shaping via the ARM QoS extensions. We make three key observations. First, our profile-driven methodology achieves, on average, 6% over-prediction on the runtime of bandwidth-regulated applications. Second, we experimentally validate that the calculated bounds hold system-wide if the main memory subsystem operates below saturation. Third, we show that the E-WarP methodology is practical even when applications exhibit input-dependent memory access patterns. We provide a full implementation of our techniques on a commercial platform (NXP S32V234). 

Ensuring real-time properties on current heterogeneous multiprocessor systems on a chip is a challenging task. Furthermore, online artificial intelligent applications –which are routinely deployed on such chips– pose increasing pressure on the memory subsystem that becomes a source of unpredictability. Although techniques have been proposed to restore independent access to memory for concurrently executing virtual machines (VM), providing predictable inter-VM communication remains challenging. In this work, we tackle the problem of predictably transferring data between virtual machines and virtualized hardware resources on multiprocessor systems on chips under consideration of memory interference. We design a "broker-based" real-time communication framework for otherwise isolated virtual machines, provide a virtio-based reference implementation on top of the Jailhouse hypervisor, assess its overheads for FreeRTOS virtual machines, and formally analyze its communication flow schedulability under consideration of the implementation overheads. Furthermore, we define a methodology to assess the maximum DRAM memory saturation empirically, evaluate the framework's performance and compare it with the theoretical schedulability. 

The paper discusses algorithmic priority inversion in mission-critical machine inference pipelines used in modern neural-network-based cyber-physical applications and develops a scheduling solution to mitigate its effect. In general, priority inversion occurs in real-time systems when computations that are of lower priority are performed together with or ahead of those that are of higher priority. 1 In current machine intelligence software, significant priority inversion occurs on the path from perception to decision-making, where the execution of underlying neural network algorithms does not differentiate between critical and less critical data. We describe a scheduling framework to resolve this problem and demonstrate that it improves the system's ability to react to critical inputs, while at the same time reducing platform cost.